<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marketposition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketposition.com/category/other-search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketposition.com</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:26:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>comScore’s July 2010 US Search Engine Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/08/20/comscore%e2%80%99s-july-2010-us-search-engine-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/08/20/comscore%e2%80%99s-july-2010-us-search-engine-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Spiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketposition.com/?p=1237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[comScore’s <a href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2010/8/comScore_Releases_July_2010_U.S._Search_Engine_Rankings">July 2010 US Search Engine Rankings</a> report is out.  And, starting this month it includes two versions of the search engine query statistics – the traditional “Core Search” numbers and the new “Explicit Core Search” metric.

Here’s the difference.  Core Search captures ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/08/20/comscore%e2%80%99s-july-2010-us-search-engine-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo’s Score Still a Topic of Conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/06/04/yahoo%e2%80%99s-score-still-a-topic-of-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/06/04/yahoo%e2%80%99s-score-still-a-topic-of-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Spiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Rankings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketposition.com/?p=1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up from 16.9% in March to 17.7% in April, Yahoo’s comScore data remains a hot topic among industry analysts. But amidst the abundance of expert opinions, it’s important to remember that comScore’s data isn’t in question &#8211; numbers are numbers.
It’s the addition of a new slideshow feature to Yahoo’s UI that has analysts questioning just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/06/04/yahoo%e2%80%99s-score-still-a-topic-of-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore’s April 2010 Search Engine Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/06/02/comscore%e2%80%99s-april-2010-search-engine-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/06/02/comscore%e2%80%99s-april-2010-search-engine-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Spiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ranking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketposition.com/?p=1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[comScore’s search numbers for April are out and although the numbers don’t lie, they don’t give you the full picture either.  Thanks to significant changes to the user interface for all three search giants, making a straight comparison between April and March figures is not necessarily an accurate analysis. Read more...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketposition.com/2010/06/02/comscore%e2%80%99s-april-2010-search-engine-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International SEO, A Check List for Improving the Rankings of International Web Sites.</title>
		<link>http://www.marketposition.com/2006/12/20/international-seo-a-check-list-for-improving-the-rankings-of-international-web-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketposition.com/2006/12/20/international-seo-a-check-list-for-improving-the-rankings-of-international-web-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webposition SEO Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Of MarketPosition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General SEO Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10.149.0.59/wordpress/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The .com domain is typically the most sought after and well known of all domain types. While a .us top level domain does exist for US companies to register, it is thought that search engines consider a .com address as related primarily to US based websites or often used by sites that are not typically country specific. If your site is based in the UK, you might still consider a .com domain as it is easy for customers to remember, but if you are focusing primarily on UK search engines, register a .co.uk domain. If your site is in Ireland, an .ie domain should be considered, .fr for France, .in for India, .ca for Canada, and so on.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketposition.com/2006/12/20/international-seo-a-check-list-for-improving-the-rankings-of-international-web-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Introduction to the Social Scene: Social Bookmarking and Tagging</title>
		<link>http://www.marketposition.com/2006/08/14/an-introduction-to-the-social-scene-social-bookmarking-and-tagging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketposition.com/2006/08/14/an-introduction-to-the-social-scene-social-bookmarking-and-tagging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webposition SEO Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Furl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socializer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StumbleUpon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10.149.0.59/wordpress/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The essence of many of the sites that I'll be touching on, is that they offer a means to converse with others in a community based web site. A wide variety of web based services and sites fall into a broad category labeled as 'social'. Many of the features that we now take for granted like email, forums, instant messaging, Usenet (most know this as Google Groups now), free web space providers, and others could all fit in the broad definition but these are not what most people are referring to when they talk about the subject today. What differentiates the old from the new? These days I believe that the 'social' category is primarily defined by sites and services that provide many of the same overall functions listed above but often with a focus on simple interfaces along with their social functions. Simplicity in that you often fill out a profile and then you are ready to start contributing vs. having to know HTML and set up a website to post links or photos... And of course the social aspects of publicly contributing comments, photos, blogs, links, or other items to the larger community of a website. Then a discuss by the community leading to the promotion or removal of the contribution in a very public fashion.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketposition.com/2006/08/14/an-introduction-to-the-social-scene-social-bookmarking-and-tagging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

